Case Study: nZEC - Energy refurbishment of 50 dwellings in Makartstrasse, Linz, Austria (UNDER MONITORING)
Name of organisation: GIWOG - Gemeinnützige Industrie-Wohnungs-AG
Stage of development: completed
Year of finalization: 2006
Type of project: refurbishment
Area: urban
Scale: group of buildings
Type of building: Apartment in a block of five or less stories
Number of units/dwellings: 50
Tenure: social rental
Street: Makartstrasse
Postcode: 4020
City: Linz
Region/ County: Oberösterreich
Country: Austria
Last Update: 15.04.2015
Short Description
The r project is the first project of retrofitting a multi-family block into passive house standard. Moreover some other aspects of modernisation are of interest; since the 5-storey building was not equipped with elevators, 4 elevators were built in.
The building is situated along a noisy street; the former balconies were of little use and were transformed into loggias. A very specific feature of the project is the façade which is a pre-fabricated panel system of a ventilated solar façade.
The buildings/dwellings were connected to the district heating. The disturbance of the residents during the modernisation process was reduced to a minimum.
Key Elements
Certification
Calculated energy demand space heating:
- before renovation 179 kWh/m2(gross)
- after renovation: 13,3 kWh/m2(gross)
Work with Residents
For the modernisation process of a building integration of residents is a key issue. It offers the chance to empower residents to live with new technologies. In the case of this project residents were informed and instructed in individual and group meetings.
Funding
Mix of own funds, bank loan and public subsidy. Extra grant for innovative renovation from federal ministry.
Costs | ||
Materials | TOTAL per m2 | |
Construction overall | € 774 | |
VAT | No VAT included, since VAT is deductible due to Austrian VAT regime (VAT on rents) | |
Space heating + hot water | € 10.110 | |
Ventilation | € 2.355,26 | |
Operation, inspection and service | € 6.363 | |
Public financial assistance (loan / grant /annuity grant…) | There is an annuity grant extended by the provincial promotion scheme which covers 40% of repayments for a loan for 25 years. An additional grant for innovative modernisation was extended by the federal ministry. |
Thermal Insulation
The insulation of the basement and roof was improved. A special solar façade was installed which not only functions as insulation but also makes passive use of sun light to temper the façade (cellulose comb behind glass panel). Due to a special combination of elements, overheating during the summer period is prevented. (GAP-system)
U-Value roof: before 0,9 and 0,094W/m2K after renovation
U-Value basement: before 0,7 and 0,21 W/m2K after renovation
U-Value façade: before 1,2 and 0,082 W/m2K after renovation (dynamic depending on solar input)
Windows and Shading
Passive house windows with integrated sun protection. U-Value: 0,86 W/m2K.
Ventilation
Each dwelling is equipped with automatic ventilation unit including heat recovery.
Heating and Hot Water
District heating.
Monitoring
Click here to access the monitoring data on the HIVE Database!
Main Results
The project is the first multi-family block retrofitted to passive house standard in Austria. Specific features (solar façade) were used to obtain this standard.
The energy aspects are not the only one scheming the modernisation measures:
- Missing elevators were built in, the building/dwellings were connected to the district heating.
- The balconies were covered to make them usable.
- As the building is situated alongside a noisy street the passive house standard (automatic ventilation) leads to more comfort for residents as the system prevents ventilation by opening windows.
Lessons learned
The project was a rather costly modernisation not only to the energetic aspects but also due to the built-in elevators. Costs for energetic aspects were estimated to be 30% of total costs, the passive house standard causing a plus of 27%.
The estimated costs of heating costs were estimated to 80% of the former level; the first years showed that this reduction was overrated but still is about 50%. Since there is public assistance for financing there are no additional costs for tenants to cover costs of construction.
Additional Information
Ms Eva Bauer
Gbv - The Austrian Federation of Limited Profit Housing Associations
E-mail: ebauer@gbv.at
Web: www.gbv.at